The silence is deafening

I've been doing some research on the memo that Iyad Allawi revealed to the London Telegraph last December. (This is the memo that reveals that Mohammed Atta was trained in Bahdgad by Abu Nidal and was in Bahdgad just two months before the 9/11 disaster.)

According to a Lexis/Nexis search, the following media outlets have carried the story:
(The links are two the media sites, not to the story.)

Worldnet Daily (USA) 12/13/2003
Ottawa Citizen (Canada) Page A8 12/14/2003
O'Reilly Factor (USA) Brief Mention 12/14/2003
Frontpage Mag (USA) 12/15/2003
National Post (Canada) Page All 12/15/2003
New York Sun (USA) Page 1 12/15/2003
Bulletin News Network (USA) 12/15/2003
Courier Mail (Australia) Page 3 12/15/2003
Indian Express (India) 12/15/2003
National Review (USA) 12/15/2003
Edmonton Sun (Canada) Page 11 (Opinion Page) 12/17/2003
Newhouse News Service (USA) 12/18/2003
London Free Press (Canada) Page A11 (Opinion Page) 12/18/2003
Seattle Times (USA) Page B7 12/19/2003
Winnipeg Sun (Canada) Page 11 12/19/2003
MSNBC Newsweek (USA) 12/19/2003 - discusses the memo and claims it's fake, without ever having examined it
New York Observer (USA) Page 4 (Politics and Opinions) 12/22/2003

Sadaam was captured on the 14th of December. Coughlin's article in the London Telegraph was published on the same day. In the glut of news about Sadaam's capture, the equally compelling story of a direct ties between Sadaam and 9/11 never made it to any major news media - not ABC, NBC, Fox, CNN, CBS, AP, UPI, Reuters, BBC, no one carried the story.

Isn't it time that the truth came out? Isn't it time that the connection between Sadaam and 9/11 (which the Bush administration has never made) became part of "all the news that's fit to print"? Isn't it time that the major media quit lying about the connection between Sadaam and al Qaeda? Sadaam and 9/11?